Philip Hazel wrote:
> There are a whole pile more tests, and maybe this time I have finally
> sorted out the problems with gecos fields.
Hmm, looks very good. :o)
OpenSSL/2125 still fails like it did the last time.
maildir/5000 exim quota + warn threshold with maildir
===============
Lines 3-6 of "test-mail-munged" do not match lines 3-6 of
"mail/5000.new/1.myhost.test.ex".
----------
id 10HmaZ-0005vi-00
for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
maildir:maildir_
Message-Id: <E10HmaZ-0005vi-00@???>
----------
id 10HmaY-0005vi-00
for userx@???; Tue, 2 Mar 1999 09:44:33 +0000
maildir:maildir_
Message-Id: <E10HmaY-0005vi-00@???>
The MessageID is different, hard to spot at the first glance.
test-mail-munged also contains lots of the following line:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
ipliteral/5300 domain literals
** Command 1 ("exim", starting at line 4)
** Return code 2 (expected 0)
show stdErr, show stdOut, Continue (...), or Quit? [Q] o
x@???
router = r1, transport = t1
host [224.9.8.7] [224.9.8.7]
x@???
router = r3, transport = t1
syntax error: malformed domain literal
The failing address here is x@[abcd::dcba], I'd guess this is due to
missing IPv6 support. Maybe you should split this into two tests and
omit the last one if IPv6 support is missing.
lg,
daniel
