On Tue, 22 Nov 2005, Bill Hacker wrote:
>
> Upstream connectivity providers that block port 25 often *cannot* open it.
>
> The law of the land (federal/national) in some jurisdictions, requires
> subscribers to
> send only over the ISP's facilities. One neck on the block when
> tracking down abuse.
>
Eh.. can you provide an example of such a jurisdiction? While I'll
agree port 25 blocks may be appropriate depending on the customer base,
this is the first of heard of their being legally mandated.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
