On Thu, 2005-11-17 at 15:07 +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 17:21:14 +0000, Nigel Metheringham
> <nigel.metheringham@???> wrote:
> >If we did, my preference would be to start a new list - maybe
> >exim-experts - and encourage the esoteric traffic to go there.
> >Theoretically exim-dev could take on this role, although its meant to
> >have a different purpose, and I would prefer it to stay relatively low
> >traffic and focused.
>
> exim-technical. There is a precedence for that, samba-technical.
I've been watching this with interest, but not contributing much (for
various personal reasons I've been pretty much out of circulation for 3
weeks and am now frantically catching up).
There are a few issues that seem to be reaching consensus:-
* Noddy does mail on the internet guides needed
* Minimal config examples required, with information on how to
start growing them
Both of these can be done within the wiki, but need effort. I can
consider doing some work on this, although I actually want to deal with
the website as a higher priority.
Additionally I think an area which needs looking at is the FAQ - I moved
it onto the wiki a year ago, and I think that (or at least this
implementation/organisation of it) was a mistake. I'd like to find a
better way of handling FAQ documentation which is easily searchable, can
be kept up to date etc - ideas on this can be posted back into this
thread.
However I'm not sure any sort of consensus in favour of a list split was
heard - in fact it seemed to me the drift was against this.
Nigel.
--
[ Nigel Metheringham Nigel.Metheringham@??? ]
[ - Comments in this message are my own and not ITO opinion/policy - ]
