On Fri, 11 Nov 2005, Daniel Tiefnig wrote:
> Sounds reasonable, as supporting empty gecos fields could be a lot of work.
Took about 15 minutes. :-) What I have done is to detect the specific
case of an empty gecos field, and then edit the *saved* file, to remove
instances of " CALLER_NAME" before doing the comparison. I think this
will work - no doubt you will test it when I next update the tests. I'm
going to add a whole pile more first.
Philip
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
