Thanks for your patience, but I'm stuck.
This is my acl_check_rcpt, slightly flattened. Where is the part,
responsible for letting through empty senders bounce messages? I can't
recognize it.
acl_check_rcpt:
accept hosts = 127.0.0.1
endpass
message = unknown user
verify = recipient
deny local_parts = ^.*[@%!/|]
deny senders = Note for this mail: some mysqlstuff here to deny
senders
message = Not accepted from $sender_address
require verify = sender
drop condition = ${if match{$sender_helo_name}{SERVER_IP}{yes}{no}
}
message = "Dropped spammer pretending to be us"
drop condition = ${if
match{$sender_helo_name}{^[0-9]\.[0-9]\.[0-9]\.[0-9]}{yes}{no} }
message = "Dropped IP-only or IP-starting helo"
drop condition = Note for this mail: some mysqlstuff to drop mail to
spam-flooded accounts
message = Sorry, outdated address. Check your contacts.
drop hosts = net-lsearch;/usr/exim/reject-hosts.txt : \
net24-lsearch;/usr/exim/reject-hosts.txt
message = Connection Denied for $sender_host_address
drop message = Too many bad recipients ${eval:$rcpt_fail_count}
out of $rcpt_count
condition = ${if = {${eval:$rcpt_fail_count}}{1}{yes}{no}}
delay = 3m
drop message = Recipient unknown
!verify = recipient
delay = ${eval: ($rcpt_fail_count + 1) * 1}m
accept local_parts = postmaster
domains = +local_domains
accept hosts = +relay_from_hosts
accept authenticated = *
accept domains = +local_domains
endpass
message = unknown user
verify = recipient
accept domains = +relay_to_domains
endpass
message = unrouteable address
verify = recipient
deny message = authentication required - relay not permitted
Am 15.11.2005 23:12 Uhr schrieb "Fred Viles" unter <fv+exim@???>:
> On 15 Nov 2005 at 21:59, Exim User wrote about
> "Re: [exim] Seeking advice how to de":
>
> | my special problem went down around other -550 discussions.
> | What should I add to my rcpt_acl to get rid of
> | > Message IPXDKM-000KV5-KU has been frozen (delivery error message).
> | > The sender is <>.
>
> Did you see my reply? The RCPT ACL stanza you posted should do it,
> *if* it is reached (no accept stanza higher up that applies) *and*
> you don't have a router that accepts all local parts for your local
> domain, whether they are valid or not.
>
> The router you posted isn't the problem, since it only accepts
> postmaster@localdomain.
>
> - Fred
>
>
>
>
