[exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim…

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: Philip Hazel
Datum:  
To: exim-cvs
Betreff: [exim-cvs] cvs commit: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt ChangeLog exim/exim-src/src/transports autoreply.c
ph10 2005/11/14 11:32:16 GMT

  Modified files:
    exim-doc/doc-txt     ChangeLog 
    exim-src/src/transports autoreply.c 
  Log:
  Correct message autoreply sends when including the original message with
  headers_only or body_only.


  Revision  Changes    Path
  1.256     +5 -0      exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog
  1.6       +13 -9     exim/exim-src/src/transports/autoreply.c


  Index: ChangeLog
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v
  retrieving revision 1.255
  retrieving revision 1.256
  diff -u -r1.255 -r1.256
  --- ChangeLog    14 Nov 2005 10:46:27 -0000    1.255
  +++ ChangeLog    14 Nov 2005 11:32:16 -0000    1.256
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.255 2005/11/14 10:46:27 ph10 Exp $
  +$Cambridge: exim/exim-doc/doc-txt/ChangeLog,v 1.256 2005/11/14 11:32:16 ph10 Exp $


   Change log file for Exim from version 4.21
   -------------------------------------------
  @@ -68,6 +68,11 @@
         $tod_xxx expansions could be wrong, because the tod_stamp() function was
         called by the debug printing, thereby overwriting the timestamp buffer.
         Debugging no longer uses the tod_stamp() function when +timestamp is set.
  +
  +PH/08 When the original message was included in an autoreply transport, it
  +      always said "this is a copy of the message, including all the headers",
  +      even if body_only or headers_only was set. It now gives an appropriate
  +      message.



Exim version 4.54

  Index: autoreply.c
  ===================================================================
  RCS file: /home/cvs/exim/exim-src/src/transports/autoreply.c,v
  retrieving revision 1.5
  retrieving revision 1.6
  diff -u -r1.5 -r1.6
  --- autoreply.c    27 Jun 2005 14:29:44 -0000    1.5
  +++ autoreply.c    14 Nov 2005 11:32:16 -0000    1.6
  @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
  -/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/transports/autoreply.c,v 1.5 2005/06/27 14:29:44 ph10 Exp $ */
  +/* $Cambridge: exim/exim-src/src/transports/autoreply.c,v 1.6 2005/11/14 11:32:16 ph10 Exp $ */


   /*************************************************
   *     Exim - an Internet mail transport agent    *
  @@ -630,28 +630,32 @@
     }


/* Copy the original message if required, observing the return size
-limit. */
+limit if we are returning the body. */

   if (return_message)
     {
  -  if (bounce_return_size_limit > 0)
  +  uschar *rubric = (tblock->headers_only)?
  +    US"------ This is a copy of the message's header lines.\n"
  +    : (tblock->body_only)?
  +    US"------ This is a copy of the body of the message, without the headers.\n"
  +    :
  +    US"------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers.\n";
  +
  +  if (bounce_return_size_limit > 0 && !tblock->headers_only)
       {
       struct stat statbuf;
       int max = (bounce_return_size_limit/DELIVER_IN_BUFFER_SIZE + 1) *
         DELIVER_IN_BUFFER_SIZE;
       if (fstat(deliver_datafile, &statbuf) == 0 && statbuf.st_size > max)
         {
  -      fprintf(f, "\n"
  -"------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers.\n"
  +      fprintf(f, "\n%s"
   "------ The body of the message is " OFF_T_FMT " characters long; only the first\n"
  -"------ %d or so are included here.\n\n", statbuf.st_size,
  +"------ %d or so are included here.\n\n", rubric, statbuf.st_size,
           (max/1000)*1000);
         }
  -    else fprintf(f, "\n"
  -"------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------\n\n");
  +    else fprintf(f, "\n%s\n", rubric);
       }
  -  else fprintf(f, "\n"
  -"------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------\n\n");
  +  else fprintf(f, "\n%s\n", rubric);


     fflush(f);
     transport_count = 0;