On Sun, 23 Oct 2005 11:21:57 +0200, Jakob Hirsch <jh@???> wrote:
>Personally I would prefer an extended SA interface, where the envelope
>sender is given. The SA people may be right with "the Return-Path is
>standard now", but Exim adds it much later in its processing. Currently,
>I end up having doubled information in my headers. It's tiny, but I try
>to prevent header bloating in general.
While Envelope-Sender is defined to be added by the last mail server
in the transmission chain, it is probably a good thing to have that
information available for servers earlier in the chain. That's why I
think that it only makes sense if it is widely deployed.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
