Johann Spies wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 12, 2005 at 07:36:52AM -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
>
>
>>Here's something I'm testing out - greylisting based on server load levels:
>>
>>
>
>I use a different strategy - not greylisting - and it seems to work.
>My load problems are normally caused by spamassassin and as I only
>scan incoming mail I do the following:
>
>smtp_reserve_hosts = 146.232.0.0/16 # (our internal network)
>
>smtp_load_reserve = 10
>
>Which causes the system to issue a temporary error to incoming mail
>until the load average drops to 10 or lower.
>
>
>Regards
>Johann
>
>
I use that too on higher load levels - but I figure why not cut the load
in the short run by temporilly deferring mail that is probably spam
forst allowing the ham to be processed.
--
Marc Perkel - marc@???
Spam Filter: http://www.junkemailfilter.com
My Blog: http://marc.perkel.com
