On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 14:53 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Oct 2005, Ron McKeating wrote:
>
> > Phil I kept the log entries, it does seem to be a very rare occurence,
> > do you want a copy of the email that caused the problem? It may help you
> > replicate it.
>
> That can't do any harm. Thanks. (Though it will be a little while before
> I actually look at it.)
OK
Return-path: <szyang8@???>
Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:29:23 +0100
Received: from [158.125.1.193] (helo=bill.lut.ac.uk)
by dougal.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1EL7q6-0000sg-Sw
for adpgt@???; Fri, 30 Sep 2005
00:29:22 +0100
Received: from [61.141.166.163] (helo=163.com)
by bill.lut.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.44)
id 1EL7q0-0000AA-UE
for pgprospectus@???; Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:29:22 +0100
From: =?GB2312?B?0e7PyMn6?= <szyang8@???>
Subject: =?GB2312?B?0rXO8aOhtPq/qrj3wOC3osaxo6E=?=
To: pgprospectus@???
Content-Type: text/plain;charset="GB2312"
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2005 07:29:26 +0800
X-Priority: 2
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-Scan-Signature: d35d600df6cb489d365aebfb10718d88
X-Spam-Score: 5.1 (+++++)
¹ó¹«Ë¾¸ºÔðÈË(¾Àí/²ÆÎñ£©ÄúºÃ!
ÎÒÊÇÉîÛÚÊпµÌØʵҵÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾£¬±¾¹«Ë¾ÔÚÈ«¹ú¸÷µØÉèÓзֹ«Ë¾£¨¹ãÖÝ¡¢¶«Ý¸µÈ
ÊÐÓзֹ«Ë¾£©¡£ÒòÈ«¹ú¸÷·Ö¹«Ë¾½øÏî½Ï¶àÏÖÍê³É²»ÁËÿÔÂÏúÊÛ¶î¶È£¬Ã¿ÔÂÓÐÒ»²¿·Ö
Ôöֵ˰µçÄÔ·¢Æ±»òº£¹Ø½É¿îÊéÒÔ6%×óÓÒ¼°ÆÕͨ¹úË°¡¢µØË°2%ÏòÍâ´ú¿ª»òºÏ×÷£¬·¢Æ±
ÖÖÀàÈçÏ£ºÉÌƷͳһÏúÊÛ¡¢µçÄÔ°æÔËÊä¡¢·þÎñÒµ¡¢¹ã¸æ¡¢½¨Öþ¹¤³Ì¡¢×âÁÞרÓõȷ¢
Ʊ¡£ÒÔÉϸ÷À෢Ʊ¿ÉÒÔ¸ù¾Ý¹ó¹«Ë¾ÊýÁ¿´óСÀ´ºâÁ¿ÓŻݵĵãÊý¡£¸üÏ£ÍûÓлú»áÓë¹ó
˾ºÏ×÷£¡
¹ó¹«Ë¾ÔÚ·¢Æ±µÄÕæα·½ÃæÓÐÈκÎÒÉÂÇ»òµ£ÐÄ£¬¿ÉÒÔÉÏÍø²éÖ¤Õæα»òÖ±½Óȥ˰Îñ
¾ÖÑéÖ¤¡£
±¾¹«Ë¾Ö£ÖسÐŵËùÓþø¶ÔÊÇÕæƱ£¡
¡¡¡¡´ËÐÅÏ¢³¤ÆÚÓÐЧ£¬ÁªÏµ·½Ê½ÈçÏ£º
¡¡¡¡´ËÐÅÏ¢³¤ÆÚÓÐЧ£¬ÁªÏµ·½Ê½ÈçÏ£º
Áª ϵ ÈË£ºÑîÒæÃ÷
ÁªÏµÊÖ»ú£º13826522963
E£MAIL £ºszyang8@???
˳ף
ÉÌì÷£¡
¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ÉîÛÚÊпµÌØʵҵÓÐÏÞ¹«Ë¾
>
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
