On Tue, 2005-10-04 at 14:18 +0100, Philip Hazel wrote:
> On Tue, 4 Oct 2005, Tony Finch wrote:
>
> > This doesn't look like the normal format for an
> > Exim log line at all.
> >
> > 2005-09-30 00:29:23 1EL7q6-0000sg-Sw => >ÑîÏÈÉú <szyang8@???>
> > <adpgt@???> R=vacation T=address_reply
>
> Note the transport. It's an auto reply. That's where the "=> >" comes
> from. However, what comes after that should be an 2821 address, as in
> this example:
>
> => >someone@??? <ph10@???>
>
> which means "delivered to ph10@??? by sending an auto reply to
> someone@???". But maybe there's a bug in there. I'll look into it
> sometime.
>
Phil I kept the log entries, it does seem to be a very rare occurence,
do you want a copy of the email that caused the problem? It may help you
replicate it.
Ron
> --
> Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
> ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
> Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
> -- ## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users ## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/ ## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
--
Ron McKeating
Senior IT Services Specialist
Computing Services
Loughborough University
01509 222329
