I do not thing thet whitelisting is good, there are a lot of viruses that
come that way. blacklisting is more effective, and han no false positive.
even spamassassin has a whitelisting capability, and i use here.
however the filter must be used by every single user, since there are
many occasions where a source is considered spam by all but a few
users.
Il 1 Oct 2005 alle 11:10 Odhiambo G. Washington immise in rete
> * On 30/09/05 19:21 -0700, Marc Perkel wrote:
> > One of the things that is creating SA load is processing good email.
> > I'm trying to figure out a way to bless stuff that I know is ham so
> > I can bypass spam assassin. And it has to somehow just learn it
> > automatically.
> DSPAM has that idea already and does whitelist senders. Perhaps you
> can consider running DSPAM and SpamAssassin together. However, the
> only instances I have seen that done are where the admins use SA
> results to train DSPAM.
> I'd say this: DSPAM has no load at all, if load is your concern, so
> think about embracing it.
--
Leonardo Boselli
Nucleo Informatico e Telematico del Dipartimento Ingegneria Civile
Universita` di Firenze , V. S. Marta 3 - I-50139 Firenze
tel +39 0554796431 cell +39 3488605348 fax +39 055495333
http://www.dicea.unifi.it/~leo
