Would that not use a lot more resources with the calculation for every piece of
mail? Seems that way. And if being used in conjunction with a mailing list
character count would not vary much as only different value would be sender
name and address. Surprising how many in a list are the exact same size.
(Also missing a "\" on one line.)
----- Original Message -----
Subject: Re: [exim] Can the Interface Option be Randomized
Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2005 15:17:04 -0700
From: "Fred Viles" <fv+exim@???>
On 23 Sep 2005 at 6:26, Marc Perkel wrote about
"Re: [exim] Can the Interface Option":
| Very nicely done Fred.
Thanks, but actually I like John Jetmore's cleverness (using
${extract) better, for a small number of IPs. I just overlooked the
fact that he'd already posted a solution before Lloyd asked the
question!
| Fred Viles wrote:
|
| >On 22 Sep 2005 at 20:35, Lloyd F. Tennison wrote about
| > "Re: [exim] Can the Interface Option":
| >
| >| Any way when they are not all sequential?
|
|... (use lsearch)
- Fred
--
## List details at
http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at
http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list -
http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
