Re: [exim] relative 'expense' of Exiscan/SpamAssassin vs. lo…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Brian Candler
CC: exim-users
Subject: Re: [exim] relative 'expense' of Exiscan/SpamAssassin vs. local_scan for simple header/body triggers?
On Sun, 18 Sep 2005, Brian Candler wrote:
>
> Have you looked at Ruby?


No, because it isn't statically typed and because there's no software
written in it that I am interested in. From what I've heard it doesn't
have much interesting to offer from the language design perspective. I
don't see much point in learning a new language that isn't going to give
me something I don't already have, so I'm looking forward to Perl 6.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}