Re: [exim-dev] widen_domains etc.

Page principale
Supprimer ce message
Répondre à ce message
Auteur: Tony Finch
Date:  
À: Philip Hazel
CC: Tony Finch, exim-dev
Sujet: Re: [exim-dev] widen_domains etc.
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Philip Hazel wrote:
>
> Well, you have really opened a can of worms there.


:-)

> However, I am not convinced this is right. Sender verification is about
> checking the incoming sender of the message, and we aren't checking that
> at this point. Perhaps there is no "right" answer.


It seems to me that there's no difference between sender verification and
receipient verification, except for the position in the envelope occupied
by the address. Part of the difficulty with errors_to is that it operates
at a point where a sender address becomes a bounce recipient address. I
take the view that bounce recipient addresses are still sender addresses
because that's where they came from originally, but this is a bit radical
and rather arguable.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}