On Thu, 8 Sep 2005, Tony Finch wrote:
> > widen_domains was certainly only ever intended to be useful for
> > recipient addresses. What could probably trivially be done is to disable
> > widen_domains when verifying a sender address, which isn't quite what
> > you said, but I think is equivalent.
>
> Yes, it is. I was thinking of various possible shades of policy when I
> wrote that message. What I've implemented for the time being is the
> following, which fairly accurately does what you describe. It would be
> better implemented in the code, though :-)
Noted.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
