On Thu, 1 Sep 2005, Stian Jordet wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 16:00 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> >
> > Why not reverse the order of the routers (so that remote users are matched
> > first) and drop the "unseen" modifier which is causing the duplicates?
>
> Well, I need to match both? Since a recipient may be an alias for both a
> local and remote user?
It would be tidier to make this explicit in your aliases. Or you can alter
your LDAP lookups in order to get the result you want. If you use unseen
you should expect to have duplicate deliveries.
> But I do not get duplicate e-mails, it's just when I test an address.
Er, but the example you gave had three different transports to three
different places so I would expect you to get three deliveries.
Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???>
http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
