Don't CC, it's rude and wasteful. It's clear I'm on the list and reading it.
Tony Finch wrote:
> Yes, but in the context of MTAs it is quite clearly defined in RFC 2821,
> and its general (ambiguous) meanings are discussed in RFC 2822. Since this
> is an MTA users' list the encapsulation-forwarding meaning is not very
> relevant.
Try again, Tony. MTAs do what again? Right, move mail around for clients
to read. It's like saying that the discussion of heads is irrelevant to tails
when they're both the same coin.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
