On 24/08/05, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@???> wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 16:05 +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> > > Umm. SPF will do MUCH better and will not give false positives
> >
> > You're new here, aren't you....
>
> Evidently. Otherwise he'd know better, and/or have already been referred
> to either something like http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html or
> just to RFC2821 and a large cup of coffee.
I would have thought that applying SPF (or Sender ID) to just the list
of domains that Marc listed would be a reasonably good solution,
assuming those organisations were publishing SPF records.
regards,
John
