On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 09:03 +0100, Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-08-24 at 16:05 +1200, Craig Whitmore wrote:
> > Umm. SPF will do MUCH better and will not give false positives
>
> You're new here, aren't you....
Evidently. Otherwise he'd know better, and/or have already been referred
to either something like
http://david.woodhou.se/why-not-spf.html or
just to RFC2821 and a large cup of coffee.
--
dwmw2