Re: [exim] Callouts, NULL DSN

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tony Finch
Date:  
To: Steve Brown
CC: exim-users, Nigel Metheringham
Subject: Re: [exim] Callouts, NULL DSN
On Mon, 22 Aug 2005, Steve Brown wrote:

> Okay, so why would one ever do a sender callout rather than just *always*
> doing a header_sender callout?


A return-path callout gives you some confidence that a message can be
bounced, and therefore greatly reduces the number of double bounces you
must deal with.

Tony.
--
<fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
\N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}