Author: Hancock, Scott Date: To: exim-users Subject: RE: [exim] relay and final rejection for exchange org.
Sorry if I was vague.
I'm hoping to also avoid generating a list.
If I:
1. build another box and configure exim to receive for local delivery of
the shared smtp domain
> -----Original Message-----
> From: fanf2@??? [mailto:fanf2@hermes.cam.ac.uk]
> On Behalf Of Tony Finch
> Sent: Monday, August 08, 2005 2:58 PM
> To: Hancock, Scott
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: RE: [exim] relay and final rejection for exchange org.
>
> On Mon, 8 Aug 2005, Hancock, Scott wrote:
>
> > Its not clear to me how that would prevent mail loops
> caused by mail
> > originating inside the organization and allow traffic
> between them.
> > Are you suggesting two lists defining who is on which exchange box?
>
> Yes, if that's your topology. You didn't explain it clearly before.
> AFAICT from your vague explanation, the Exchange servers
> don't know which addresses are valid so send everything to
> the Exim machine. Something needs to know the list of valid
> addresses, and since Exchange doesn't it'll have to be Exim.
> Alternatively you might be able to do it by querying the AD:
> see
> http://www.exim.org/pipermail/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20040816/ 075152.html >
> Tony.
> --
> <fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
> N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
> \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
>
>