Marc,
you got it.
> You missed a subtlety in the OPs condition -- the inner and has
> {no}{yes}, implying that he acutally intended a nand between those two
> conditions, not an and. So:
>
> { !and \
>
> should work for you. If that still fails (which would be a genuine exim
> bug), try replacing !and{{eq...}{match...}} with or{{!eq...}{!match...}}.
thank you very much for that hint, it works.
Jakob, also thak you for the tips how to write clean conditions.
regards Martin
--
----------------------------------------------------------------
Air conditioned environment - Do not open Windows.
----------------------------------------------------------------
