On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Jakob Hirsch wrote:
> NOT (a OR b) = (NOT a) AND (NOT b)
>
> On the subject: I think you are right, they are functionally equivalent.
Looks like it. I had ignored the "nots" when I gave my general answer.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book