Re: [exim] no ehlo possible when sender IP has no hostname

On 24 Jul 2005 at 19:12, Roman Khassraf wrote about

    "Re: [exim] no ehlo possible when se":

| i think you are right with the firewall
| the client is behind a cisco 836 dsl router, installed and maintained by the
| ISP, i think that mailguard feature is on.

Forgot to add, if that's it you can probably work around it by using
the MSA port (or some non-standard port) instead of port 25 to
connect. Arguably one should always use the submission port for
authenticated MUA connections anyway...

- Fred