On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Edgar Lovecraft wrote:
> Okay, we could shorten that :P
>
> $message_transportID ??
How about $message_exim_id? (That's not a huge change from $message_id,
which seems like a benefit.)
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Bob Johannessen wrote:
> Wasn't there a wish to have the message ID allocated at MAIL FROM:
> time? If that's implemented I think transaction_id would be a
> descriptive name...
Yes, there was. It's on the Wish List. It might even get done sometime. :-)
However, I think a lot of people aren't all that clued up as to what a
"transaction" is. :-(
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
