Re: [exim-dev] Documentation clarification for pipe transpor…

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Tony Finch
CC: exim-dev
Subject: Re: [exim-dev] Documentation clarification for pipe transport.
On Wed, 6 Jul 2005, Tony Finch wrote:

> I think Sendmail uses the term "queue id". However changing Exim's term is
> more than just a documentation problem, because of things like $message_id.


There could be a synonym and it could be carefully documented. I don't
really like "queue id", since it suggests an ordering. I think the
variable should be $message_something. After all, if ever we extend Exim
to have multiple queues, $queue_id becomes ambiguous. $message_handle?

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book