On Tue, 5 Jul 2005, David Wilson wrote:
> The definition for "MESSAGE_ID" is simply "the message's id". I've just spent
> a bit of time wondering why a far-off part of my system was seeing Exim's ID
> for the message instead of the Message-ID. Of course, I should have considered
> which ID was being referred to when I first read the documentation. :)
>
> Nonetheless, I think it would be a good thing to make it a little bit clearer,
> say: "Exim's ID for the message (this not the Message-ID: header)".
Good point. Noted. Thanks.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
