Re: [exim] a large number of domains fronted by Exim are ref…

Pàgina inicial
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Autor: Matthew Byng-Maddick
Data:  
A: exim-users
Assumpte: Re: [exim] a large number of domains fronted by Exim are refusing bounces...
On Fri, Jul 01, 2005 at 12:20:55PM +0200, Oliver Egginger wrote:
[> I wrote, but Oliver snipped the attribution:]
>> Which means, to anyone who understands English, that you have to have a
>> pretty good reason to emit null-reverse-path mail for any reason other
>> than the standards-track RFC (all of which, to my knowledge, are based on
>> reverse paths of incoming messages).
> It's advisable to do sender callouts with a null-reverse-path.
> At the moment we do sender callouts and reject every message which can't
> be verified by a callout. But by reading this thread I arrive at the
> conclusion that I'll better disable all denies which are based on sender
> callouts.


One could argue that it's not advisable to do sender callouts at all. However,
the sender callout is triggered by the return-path of an incoming message.
Which gets me back to my point.

Cheers

MBM

-- 
Matthew Byng-Maddick          <mbm@???>           http://colondot.net/
                      (Please use this address to reply)