Author: Ian Eiloart Date: To: Exim User's Mailing List Subject: Re: [exim] a large number of domains fronted by Exim are refusing
bounces...
--On 30 June 2005 16:10:47 -0400 "Greg A. Woods" <woods@???>
wrote:
>
> Exim should must never allow $sender to expand to anything that can be
> represented in the configuration language whenever it is set by an
> incoming SMTP (or SUBMIT, or LMTP, etc.) transaction to be a null return
> path. That's going to be the only way to properly prevent idiots from
> causing harm, at least given the current architecture and flexibility.
Er, so what would you have it expand to? Some invented address? An error?
Whatever it does expand to, there will be a way of matching it.
