Greg A. Woods wrote:
> Well, such attempts at refutation have failed miserably since they've
> all failed to take into account that there are other in fact other
> existing and successfull implementations which do make it difficult for
> admins to blindly ignore such basic protocol requirements as handling
> messages which have null return paths.
And yet this is the Exim mailing list. I dare say that if other
implementations were so successful we would be using them, wouldn't we?
> I've never heard anyone complaint that such implementations are more
> difficult to use than they need to be either.
Funny. And yet you go on to cite FAQs.
> BTW, as I've told you numerous times before if you want people to reply
> to the list without CCing you then you need to follow the RFC-suggested
> protocol for doing so and set your reply-to address to be the list
> address. It works for everyone else, including both Philip and myself.
And as I pointed out previously List-Post is there, Mail-Copies-To is not
set. Stop living in the '80s Greg. 'sides, as you no doubt know by now I
have resolved the issue of your stupidity. While one cannot RFC against
stupidity one can filter against it nicely.
2005-06-29 15:25:00 H=(building.weird.com) [204.92.254.24]
F=<woods@???> rejected RCPT <grey@???>: Idiot filter: I
said no CCs, stupid.
Until you learn better behavior enjoy the bouces that must be delivered.
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
