Greg A. Woods wrote:
> [ On Saturday, June 25, 2005 at 13:02:16 (-0700), Steve Lamb wrote: ]
>> This has nothing to do with the matter at hand and everything to do with
>> the fact that said people refuse basic training. You can't RFC against
>> stupidity.
> The point is that one can build implementations of standard protocols in
> such a way that the users of those implementations cannot easily ignore the
> rules defined by the protocol standard.
No, that's *your* point. Which has been refuted, numerous times, by the
very valid point that to do so would make other things which should be easy
more difficult than they need to be. It is patently obvious that you would
not be satisfied until such behavior were removed.
BTW, just to prove my point about RFCing out stupidity. I've told you
before[1] and I'm telling you again. Do not CC me on list mail. I get the
list just fine.
[1]
http://www.exim.org/mail-archives/exim-users/Week-of-Mon-20040531/msg00210.html
--
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
PGP Key: 8B6E99C5 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
-------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
