[exim] High Perf server - was (exim allowed someone to slam …

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Andrew Johnson
Date:  
To: exim-users, peter
CC: 
Old-Topics: Re: [exim] exim allowed someone to slam my mail server for 3 hours
Subject: [exim] High Perf server - was (exim allowed someone to slam my mail server for 3 hours)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Tony Finch [mailto:dot@dotat.at]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 1:39 PM
> To: peter@???
> Cc: exim-users@???
> Subject: Re: [exim] exim allowed someone to slam my mail
> server for 3 hours
>
>
> Exim doesn't support tightly-coupled clusters. This is a
> weakness in the implementation of the hints DBs, and fixing
> it was outside the scope of the ratelimit project. There are
> other things that would benefit from better hints DBs: the
> current implementation is a major bottleneck for high
> capacity servers, so there's scope for improved performance;
> sharing the hints DBs will reduce duplicated work across a
> cluster (retrys, callouts, etc.); greylisting would be much
> better if implemented cluster-wide rathe than per-machine.
> Perhaps one day someone will tackle it :-)
>
> Tony.


Any thoughts on how to improve the current performance of the hints
databases ?. We currently use exim to deliver ~250,000 messages a day and
are about to implement a system to take that to 2.5M per day (We use
multiple load balanced servers) but I have the same concerns about the db's
- particually as now the rate limit stuff uses them too.

-Andy-

--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.323 / Virus Database: 267.8.6/33 - Release Date: 28/06/2005