On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 10:23:50 -0400 (EDT), Dave Lugo
<dlugo@???> wrote:
>On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Peter Bowyer wrote:
>> > Are you looking at exim's spec.txt? Section 40.2 shows as "Scanning
>> > with SpamAssassin" in both the 4.50 and 4.51 versions I'm looking
>> > at.
>>
>> OK, section 40, the Exiscan docs.
>>
>> So in the example above, do the %d and %l get substituted at scan time
>> with values passed from the spam= line? Or just the %d from the username
>> passed?
>
>Both %d and %l.
And which values do you suggest using in the spam= line, as there are
not recipient-based variables available?
Maybe, it would be a good idea to have $first_domain and
$first_local_part always initialized, even on messages that have
multiple recipients, so that at least one recipient (and the only one
in the common case of a message with only one recipient) gets proper
handling?
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
