On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 10:56 +0100, Tony Finch wrote:
> The thing to realise is that dsn.rfc-ignorant.org is purely factual; how
> people use its information (causing email to be accepted or rejected) is
> up to them. It isn't actually very effective because its coverage is too
> patchy. If you want a callback whitelist you are better off with the
> /use_postmaster option instead.
>
Hello,
Curious about the last statement there. The manual says 'use_postmaster'
is for recipient callouts (callforward) only. Yet, surely use of
rfc-ignorant.org is for sender callouts (callback)?
John.
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
John Horne, University of Plymouth, UK Tel: +44 (0)1752 233914
E-mail: John.Horne@??? Fax: +44 (0)1752 233839
