On Tue, 14 Jun 2005, Peter Bowyer wrote:
> >
> >
> > Are you looking at exim's spec.txt? Section 40.2 shows as "Scanning
> > with SpamAssassin" in both the 4.50 and 4.51 versions I'm looking
> > at.
>
>
> OK, section 40, the Exiscan docs.
>
> So in the example above, do the %d and %l get substituted at scan time
> with values passed from the spam= line? Or just the %d from the username
> passed?
>
Both %d and %l.
--
--------------------------------------------------------
Dave Lugo dlugo@??? LC Unit #260 TINLC
Have you hugged your firewall today? No spam, thanks.
--------------------------------------------------------
Are you the police? . . . . No ma'am, we're sysadmins.
