[ On Saturday, June 4, 2005 at 15:19:13 (+0100), Mark Smith wrote: ]
> Subject: RE: [exim] Reducing load vs seeing all the spam
>
>
> >> Because there might be some senders you need to whitelist who would fail
> the
> >> RBL checks,
>
> > I'm assuming you're mistaken -- there must be a way to whitelist against
> > RBL checks no matter where in the transaction the check is done.
>
> If you've come up with some way of checking the envelope sender at connect
> time, I'd be very interested to hear it.
RBLs aren't about envelope sender addresses -- they're about the client
IP address.
Unless you're thinking of basing your whitelist on the sender address,
which would be a really stupid idea in my estimation since that's just
as easily forged.
--
Greg A. Woods
H:+1 416 218-0098 W:+1 416 489-5852 x122 VE3TCP RoboHack <woods@???>
Planix, Inc. <woods@???> Secrets of the Weird <woods@???>
