RE: [exim] Possible bug -- def:acl_m0 operator misbehavior.

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Philip Hazel
Date:  
To: Eli
CC: exim-users, 'Rafa3 Kupka'
Subject: RE: [exim] Possible bug -- def:acl_m0 operator misbehavior.
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005, Eli wrote:

> Yeah, I had read that as well. I was adding the header lines in the DATA
> phase (not predata) at the beginning of it, and then trying to test for the
> headers I was adding at the very end of the DATA phase - so it was all
> within the same ACL (well, I use require lines to include other ACLs, but it
> was the DATA phase executing them all).


Oh, I guess it should say the same thing for DATA that it says for RCPT.
Nothing actually gets added until afterwards, so you can't do what you
are trying to do, I'm afraid.

-- 
Philip Hazel            University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@???      Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book:    http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book