Re: [exim] Availability of return-path to Exiscan

Craig Jackson wrote:
> I see that it would be very useful to send a return-path header through
> Exiscan to Spamassassin. Currently, that header is not passed. I even
> have this in the acl just before SA is called in Exiscan:
>
> warn message = Return-Path: $sender_address
>
> But apparently it is not sent because SA does not see it. Is there any
> way to have this header sent?

OK, I see it's against the rfc to have this information until tranport.
I'll try to handle this another way. But suggestions would be welcome.
Thanks,
Craig Jackson