RE: [exim] Message size checks on spam ACLs

Chris Edwards wrote:
> For (mild) amusement, a recent 419 spam that sneaked in unscanned
> over the size limit contained a load of crud and an attached image,
> which I've put on the web at:

Nice.

Out of curiosity, how big was the message? I'm currently only sending
things under 100k to SA, but I may need to up that.

- S