Re: [exim] Message size checks on spam ACLs

Nigel Metheringham wrote:
> SA
> cannot do that for us right now (since we bypass the bit that could do
> it for us).

That's the klutzy bit. It *should*. There's a command-line once to
start the verdammt thing, yes? If it can't, right now, operating
in that mode, it should be fixed.

-J