On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, Dickenson, Steven wrote:
> There's been some discussion of late on the SpamAssassin mailing list
> about spamd memory usage skyrocketing for Exim users. The current
> thinking is that the persons reporting this problem are not checking
> (and thus limiting) the size of messages being sent to spamd. I noticed
> that the spam ACL examples in the 4.5 spec don't include (or even
> mention) size checks. Is it possible to get this added to avoid
> confusion?
Noted.
--
Philip Hazel University of Cambridge Computing Service,
ph10@??? Cambridge, England. Phone: +44 1223 334714.
Get the Exim 4 book: http://www.uit.co.uk/exim-book
