On Thu, 26 May 2005 14:36:46 +0200, Florian Weimer <fw@???>
wrote:
>* David Woodhouse:
>> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> > to give the same behavior like an included ACL snippet, with all verbs
>>> > in the sub-acl doing exactly the same as if they were called in the
>>> > main ACL.
>>>
>>> I don't think there is a suitable choice for $VERB which results in
>>> the desired behavior.
>>
>> Doesn't 'require' do it?
>
>It comes close, but it's not fully transparent for "drop" and
>"discard", at least according to the specification.
If you're right, we need an "include" verb.
Greetings
Marc
--
-------------------------------------- !! No courtesy copies, please !! -----
Marc Haber | " Questions are the | Mailadresse im Header
Mannheim, Germany | Beginning of Wisdom " | http://www.zugschlus.de/
Nordisch by Nature | Lt. Worf, TNG "Rightful Heir" | Fon: *49 621 72739834
