Auteur: Florian Weimer Date: À: David Woodhouse CC: exim-users, Marc Haber Sujet: Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semantics and
flexibility?
* David Woodhouse:
> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > to give the same behavior like an included ACL snippet, with all verbs
>> > in the sub-acl doing exactly the same as if they were called in the
>> > main ACL.
>>
>> I don't think there is a suitable choice for $VERB which results in
>> the desired behavior.
>
> Doesn't 'require' do it?
It comes close, but it's not fully transparent for "drop" and
"discard", at least according to the specification.
