Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semant…

Αρχική Σελίδα
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Συντάκτης: Florian Weimer
Ημερομηνία:  
Προς: David Woodhouse
Υ/ο: exim-users, Marc Haber
Αντικείμενο: Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semantics and flexibility?
* David Woodhouse:

> On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > to give the same behavior like an included ACL snippet, with all verbs
>> > in the sub-acl doing exactly the same as if they were called in the
>> > main ACL.
>>
>> I don't think there is a suitable choice for $VERB which results in
>> the desired behavior.
>
> Doesn't 'require' do it?


It comes close, but it's not fully transparent for "drop" and
"discard", at least according to the specification.