Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semant…

Startseite
Nachricht löschen
Nachricht beantworten
Autor: David Woodhouse
Datum:  
To: Florian Weimer
CC: exim-users, Marc Haber
Betreff: Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semantics and flexibility?
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 13:43 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > to give the same behavior like an included ACL snippet, with all verbs
> > in the sub-acl doing exactly the same as if they were called in the
> > main ACL.
>
> I don't think there is a suitable choice for $VERB which results in
> the desired behavior.


Doesn't 'require' do it?

--
dwmw2