Auteur: Florian Weimer Date: À: Marc Haber CC: exim-users Sujet: Re: [exim] Which verb to use for a sub-ACL preserving semantics and
flexibility?
* Marc Haber:
> I am now wondering whether there is a verb which would allow a single
>
> .ifdef CHECK_RCPT_LOCAL_ACL
> $VERB
> acl = CHECK_RCPT_LOCAL_ACL
> .endif
>
> to give the same behavior like an included ACL snippet, with all verbs
> in the sub-acl doing exactly the same as if they were called in the
> main ACL.
I don't think there is a suitable choice for $VERB which results in
the desired behavior.
