Re: [exim] domainkeys experiment and c=simple always bad

Top Page
Delete this message
Reply to this message
Author: Tom Kistner
Date:  
To: derti
CC: Exim-Users \(E-mail\)
New-Topics: [exim] Domainkeys-0.65 release
Subject: Re: [exim] domainkeys experiment and c=simple always bad
derti wrote:

> 0.65 (or current CVS) fixed the whole dk_headers handling, I think I
> mentioned it in the changelog. Actually, in the 0.64 code the h=
> handling was broken when verifying if there were duplicate header labels
> (ie: Recieved:) but were not all in order (ie: Recieved: Sender:
> Recieved:) . 0.64 re-orders the headers so they are in order (ie:
> Recieved: Recieved: Sender:)then generated the sig to compare which was
> incorrect. Using the new dk_rdupe() function when signing will get
> around this problem for servers that use the older code. If you use
> dk_rdupe you MUST remember to also add the h= tag.


Thanks Tim.

Also sorry for not getting back to you earlier. I was terribly busy for
a while :)

/tom