Re: [exim] domainkeys experiment and c=simple always bad

Paul Dekkers wrote:

> Is the h= tag a responsibility of this library as well? I noticed that
> it is not in my signature (but libdomainkey's test-tools have an option
> to include it or not, so maybe it is in the library); sounds like this
> tag makes the thing less fragile, maybe, and is therefore worth having?

When I implemented DK in Exim the h= signing support of the lib was ...
rather unfinished. The code already has a dk_headers option, but it does
not work yet. On my todo list. Checking messages signed using h= should
work tho.

/tom