Hi,
John Horne wrote:
>Secondly, using a named ACL is there a difference between:
>
> acl = ! some_other_acl
> ! acl = some_other_acl
>
>We currently don't use named ACL's but am about to do so. As far as I
>can tell (read) the 'some_other_acl' acts like any other ACL and returns
>'accept' or 'deny'. As such a '!' will just negate that answer, so the
>above 2 statements are again the same. Correct?
>
>
It's not always accept or deny that is returned... You can have "defer"
or "drop" for instance. How would you invert that in your nested acl?! ;-)
Paul
P.S. I've never seen nested acl's that where negated. There is no
example about that in the spec (or in my exim book), so I would assume
you cannot do that, but I'm not sure.
