Re: [exim] odd spamd error, people say it's an exim bug

hrmm so i don't have a local_sa_delivery etc to add temp_errors too.

where should it go?

On 5/17/05, Justin Frydman <justin.frydman@???> wrote:
> is this patch included in exim 4.51? if not then this bug is not fixed.
>
> Yes i'm pretty sure this happens during decent highload (nothing
> insane at any matter)
>
> so like I said before, that patch is for exim 4.50 and I am using
> 4.51, will that patch work with exim 4.51?
>
> On 5/17/05, Tony Finch <dot@???> wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 May 2005, Justin Frydman wrote:
> >
> > > Yeah that's the one. That patch is for exim 4.50 and i am using 4.51.
> > >
> > > any other info on the matter?
> >
> > Why do you think the bug hasn't been fixed? If this is happening to you at
> > times of high load then you need to fix your configuration to throttle the
> > delivery rate.
> >
> > You also need to fix your configuration to not consider pipe delivery
> > failures to be permanent errors, as I explained in the spamassassin
> > bugzilla entry.
> >
> > Tony.
> > --
> > <fanf@???> <dot@???> http://dotat.at/ ${sg{\N${sg{\
> > N\}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}\
> > \N}{([^N]*)(.)(.)(.*)}{\$1\$3\$2\$1\$3\n\$2\$3\$4\$3\n\$3\$2\$4}}
> >
>